How do the two platforms differ?
Recruiting Commander coordinates job requests, approvals, candidate review and offer readiness. Project Commander connects plans, ownership, dependencies, documents and reported progress. Start with the work your team needs to coordinate.
Can a platform follow our current process?
We review your workflow, roles and reporting before agreeing on configuration and required integrations. Fit and implementation scope are established for your engagement.
Does Recruiting Commander make hiring decisions?
Hiring decisions remain with authorized recruiters, hiring managers and HR. The platform organizes context, review and handoffs.
What recruiting work can it help organize?
The verified workflow covers job requests, required approvals, requisitions, candidate review and offer preparation. Sourcing channels, permissions and delivery arrangements are agreed for each configuration.
Do all recruiting participants see the same information?
Access follows each role and authorized scope. Candidates receive their application context; hiring managers receive review context; HR handles assigned approvals; management receives authorized reporting.
What does Project Commander bring together?
Plans, task ownership, dependencies, documents, risks, issues, decisions and reported progress can be reviewed in context, with authorized project and portfolio views.
How is project progress presented?
Progress reflects the available plan, task states and reported evidence. It is not a rating of people. Reporting definitions and practices are agreed with the team.
How can Isabel assist a project team?
The reviewed assistance supports questions and explanations using authorized project context, evidence, risks and possible next steps. Summary and draft-update workflows receive human review; availability depends on the validated configuration.
Does AI execute project actions independently?
The reviewed assistance does not autonomously execute tasks or send email. People review suggested next steps and retain responsibility for decisions and actions.
Can we keep existing tools and documents?
We discuss your existing information and tools. Retention, migration and integrations depend on access, technical fit and agreed scope.
How are access and implementation defined?
Roles, authorized scope, configuration, integrations, training and transition are agreed for the engagement. Requirements and workflow validation guide implementation.
What support is included?
Support, ownership, training and ongoing changes are defined for the engagement. Discuss your operating needs so suitable arrangements can be agreed.